Stanford’s Robotic Audi TTS

Posted by: admin  /  Category: Audi Sports Cars


Stanford’s latest robot car, an autonomous Audi TTS, will race to the top of Pikes Peak in 2010. Read more at www.botjunkie.com

Tags: , ,

25 Responses to “Stanford’s Robotic Audi TTS”

  1. skny Says:

    NEXT !!!!!!!

  2. FriendlyDriver Says:

    Do you like this car? Sign up and discuss them in V6wall com;)

  3. greenheadjoe Says:

    great stuff

  4. lobisal Says:

    2:25 simply fantastic

  5. henik9 Says:

    As long as they have a “manual” management, I am one car to car drivers of tomorrow. .

  6. ethanmonat Says:

    I’m sure I’m not a robot car, where investigators can not tell the difference between “continuous” and “safer”.

  7. 1sedition1 Says:

    lol, the sound that you like my father.

  8. dfhohj Says:

    Kiss goodbye to the car, which nobody noticed that the fat Jew left @ 0:25 hes sure that the gas engine is still alive, even though it all and all its Jews and Arabs brothrs money out of gas. I can not believe I saw it? Why can jus kill.

  9. Yuechang11 Says:

    However, the film is about the future, we’ll see.

  10. Notirez Says:

    If one has its own car service and Bodger to: better pitch control, thank you: p

  11. redghost105 Says:

    @ Octamedso would really suck to be 100 mph or so, then they are just confused and spin

  12. redghost105 Says:

    @ OctamedIch agree. . . . It is quite dangerous Australien wouldnt mind haveing self-driving, if I could, from the throne selfdriving wennwie when turned in 7 hours drive automatically aufAber when I went in trying to manage entertainment and automatic shutdown. . . i wouldnt mind dassund something about this idea istweil his technolegy be confused with the mess sooner or later no matter what

  13. Octamed Says:

    Now you actually have a place;) In Australia, they do ABS and electronic stability control mandatory. I personally, what really matters is very dangerous, because people greatly overestimate their physical abilities vehicles (and their own). People need to know how to drive and nothing less than automatic, is dangerous. The “half” auto car that you do not feel that losing the car and it is wrong. But if it looks good on paper, then to the right: |

  14. redghost105 Says:

    @ OctamedKumpel. . . Recht youe feel like an idiot jetztguter way to get it betrachtenaber you never know. . . . This may be so many lives, and they’ll begin, laws that have auto save car with the law (here thinking about America … because I do not live in America), that life can be saved as a bad thing, if

  15. cigp Says:

    its better to have this technology, which is currently

  16. Octamed Says:

    This is when cars replaced horses, which I’m sure that some people said, “But I like to ride, cars are shit. Guess what? You can continue to run:) Automatic car to stop just yet fuckwit of killing innocent people. There is much today, “manual” procedure as a horse.

  17. redghost105 Says:

    @ Octamedid enough for 50 with a fun Lebendann die 100 to stay inside to be safe

  18. Octamed Says:

    There is no death.

  19. redghost105 Says:

    There is no entertainment in the car that runs them –

  20. 55break55 Says:

    they should not drive for shit fun sports coupe

  21. suprakilzz26 Says:

    sickkk part at 3:26

  22. HumourAustralia Says:

    Love to Drive TT-S to me? Cool though. . .

  23. latquac Says:

    I think that they are not associated with MS, because they are not s-tronic transmission

  24. MTC0316 Says:

    Why not TT RS?

  25. ShizzleSwizzle Says:

    @ ToneyDanzaHey, you’re my boss.

Leave a Reply